3 ms·
> This is how limited type systems are still very much better than no types. This is not what I was arguing against. I was arguing that I would be surprised if
by leshow 7y ago
> This is how limited type systems are still very much better than no types.
This is not what I was arguing against. I was arguing that I would be surprised if people were happy to go from strong typing to dynamic typing, not that 'limited' type systems are better than 'no types'.
- fulafel 7y agoAh. My original comment was about how limited type systems are still useful, in response to someone not seeing their point when using them. Communication is hard :)