3 ms·
> Pretty much anything even remotely controversial could fall foul of this law. That's not how English law works though. Please can you link to the section of
by DanBC 7y ago
> Pretty much anything even remotely controversial could fall foul of this law.
That's not how English law works though.
Please can you link to the section of English law being talked about? Or any cases on Bailii or judiciary.gov for offences under this law? The author has article 10 rights to freedom of expression if he thinks he's being censored.
I think if people read the actual law, or previous cases, they're normally somewhat reassured.
- manfredo 7y agoThis quote is the publisher's reply to Flynn.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]