> If suddently the sole meat option is more expensive than yesterdays cheaper meat My understanding was that they went from three meat options to two, and I sa

> If suddently the sole meat option is more expensive than yesterdays cheaper meat My understanding was that they went from three meat options to two, and I saw no indication in the abstract that they changed pricing (but I haven't read the paper), but yes, there are possible scenarios in which they were "forced" to eat non-meat. More plausible, to me, is that most people who regularly eat meat are not that uptight about it, and willing to try other stuff without feeling victimized. But yes, I also know people who are the opposite.