3 ms·
>And the web was designed with the intent of running code practically from the beginning This is absolute nonsense. In the beginning the web didn't even have i
by romaniv 7y ago
>And the web was designed with the intent of running code practically from the beginning
This is absolute nonsense. In the beginning the web didn't even have inline images. It was a text-only protocol.
https://www.wired.com/2008/09/history-of-img-and-embed-tags/ https://www.wired.com/2008/09/history-of-img-and-embed-tags/
Cookies and script tags were hacks added by Netscape, IIRC.
- krapp 7y ago>This is absolute nonsense. In the beginning the web didn't even have inline images. It was a text-only protocol. Maybe you misinterpreted my comment. "practically from the beginning" does not mean the same thing as "from the beginning." I think something that was considered to be a part of the HTML spec, regardless of how it came about, since the 1990s counts as "practically from the beginning." >Cookies and script tags were hacks added by Netscape, IIRC. Tim Berners-Lee didn't seem to have a problem with the premise of embedded scripting in HTML in 1992[0], albeit not with the script tag and JS per se. And my comment was more referring to whether or not executing code in a browser was considered a legitimate use of HTML and the web at the time - and clearly it was, albeit not universally. That paradigm wasn't something Netscape just "hacked" in and entirely forced upon an unwitting web. [0]http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1992/0064.html http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1992/0064.html