3 ms·
The only meat I'd eat is from an animal, living in excellent conditions, dying of old age. If the species was ever bred, it must have been bred exclusively for
by superpermutat0r 7y ago
The only meat I'd eat is from an animal, living in excellent conditions, dying of old age. If the species was ever bred, it must have been bred exclusively for health and fitness, not for higher yield of flesh or milk. If it was not bred, the reproduction should have no human intervention.
Everything else life related should not have human intervention, if it does not improve upon the quality of life.
Although, this view is pretty idyllic and probably unattainable or not profitable.
- gridlockd 7y ago> Although, this view is pretty idyllic and probably unattainable or not profitable. It's on the extreme end, but there is a spectrum of how we allow animals to be raised. At the one end, even those with the lowest incomes can afford meat, but conditions are bad. At the other end, only the wealthy can afford meat, but conditions can be good. That's the trade-off. Profit is just markup, it can be made either way.