3 ms·
The thing is, you don't need to be entirely vegetarian to have a big impact on your environmental footprint, etc. Many meals can do well, or even be improved,
by jacknews 7y ago
The thing is, you don't need to be entirely vegetarian to have a big impact on your environmental footprint, etc.
Many meals can do well, or even be improved, by having 'much less meat'. After all, meat has been a sign of prosperity for a long time, and so it's been stuffed into many recipes that probably don't need it, or that need much less of it than curretly practiced.
'less-itarian', if you like.
- Majestic121 7y agoThere's actually a word for what you describe : flexitarian
- LOLTITTIES 7y agoI thought flexitarian is a vegetarian who sometimes eats meat. I think reducetarian is what the term is for eating less in general.
- collyw 7y agoI thought flaxitarian was more part-time vegan. My vegetarian friend uses it when he changes his mind and wants some meat.