5 ms·

https://gitea.io/en-us/ https://gitea.io/en-us/ (and its parent https://gogs.io/ https://gogs.io/ ) https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/#self-managed https://abou

https://gitea.io/en-us/ https://gitea.io/en-us/ (and its parent https://gogs.io/ https://gogs.io/ ) https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/#self-managed https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/#self-managed https://github.com/enterprise https://github.com/enterprise

DarkStar851 7y ago
Big +1 for Gitea/Gogs, that thing will run on a toaster. Super low memory footprint and great for small shops.
- deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]
wbl 7y ago
?? Git works just fine without any of that. CVS has been around since 1990, RCS since 1982. And SCCS is old enough to be OP's father.
- reificator 7y ago
  > ?? Git works just fine without any of that. I echo your ??. Sure you don't need a central repository to use git. What does that have to do with suggesting some git hosts that aren't cloud based?
  - wbl 7y ago
    You can have a git repo on a server that developers use ssh to access just with git. The bells and whistles aren't part of the core job. It's just my general griping about software these days.
    - reificator 7y ago
      I get where you're coming from, but I still don't think it deserves a ??. Most people in most environments want a GUI they can click around in. I'm very comfortable with git at the command line, but I still think it's valuable to have a web interface. For instance, with a web GUI I'm able to share a link to a specific line or range in a file in a specific commit. Typically if I need to do that I'm asking a question or requesting a change, and in that case I want there to be as few barriers as possible to increase the chances that the other person cooperates. Asking someone to clone/pull the repo, checkout a hash, and then view a line in a file is a much higher barrier than asking them to click a link.
    - bmarkovic 7y ago
      Good luck doing code reviews with a distributed team using that.
      - teambayleaf 7y ago
        Linux is one of the most massively distributed projects in the world, and it just works fine without GUI review tools. If Linux devs don't need such tools like gitlab, why you?

DarkStar851 7y ago

Big +1 for Gitea/Gogs, that thing will run on a toaster. Super low memory footprint and great for small shops.

deleted 7y ago
[deleted]

wbl 7y ago

?? Git works just fine without any of that. CVS has been around since 1990, RCS since 1982. And SCCS is old enough to be OP's father.

reificator 7y ago
> ?? Git works just fine without any of that. I echo your ??. Sure you don't need a central repository to use git. What does that have to do with suggesting some git hosts that aren't cloud based?
- wbl 7y ago
  You can have a git repo on a server that developers use ssh to access just with git. The bells and whistles aren't part of the core job. It's just my general griping about software these days.
  - reificator 7y ago
    I get where you're coming from, but I still don't think it deserves a ??. Most people in most environments want a GUI they can click around in. I'm very comfortable with git at the command line, but I still think it's valuable to have a web interface. For instance, with a web GUI I'm able to share a link to a specific line or range in a file in a specific commit. Typically if I need to do that I'm asking a question or requesting a change, and in that case I want there to be as few barriers as possible to increase the chances that the other person cooperates. Asking someone to clone/pull the repo, checkout a hash, and then view a line in a file is a much higher barrier than asking them to click a link.
  - bmarkovic 7y ago
    Good luck doing code reviews with a distributed team using that.
    - teambayleaf 7y ago
      Linux is one of the most massively distributed projects in the world, and it just works fine without GUI review tools. If Linux devs don't need such tools like gitlab, why you?