3 ms·

Standing between Saudi Arabia and Iran was Saddam Hussein and his military. By removing him it created a power vacuum that has been filled by various groups ove

Standing between Saudi Arabia and Iran was Saddam Hussein and his military. By removing him it created a power vacuum that has been filled by various groups over time. The different election results in Iraq over the years now point to a chess game between Iran and Saudi Arabia for regional control. Now instead of Iraq standing between the other two, it's serving as a way to create conflict where the two may eventually fight each other like the Iran-Iraq war in the 80s. If the U.S. does not get involved in this scenario then the long term strategic outcome of the 2003 Iraq war might be seen differently. On the other hand, if Iran wins and becomes more powerful, the Iraq war will look even worse.

icebraining 7y ago
Which is exactly what was predicted: "That's a very volatile part of the world. And if you take down the central government in Iraq, you could easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off. Part of it the Syrians would like to have, the west. Part of eastern Iraq the Iranians would like to claim. Fought over for eight years. In the north, you've got the Kurds. And if the Kurds spin loose and join with Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey. It's a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq." -- Dick Cheney
- kamyarg 7y ago
  Correct me if I am wrong but isn't Cheney the one that basically pushed the war? When is this quote from? From the Wikipedia article: > Following the US invasion of Iraq, Cheney remained steadfast in his support of the war, stating that it would be an "enormous success story",[90] and made many visits to the country. He often criticized war critics, calling them "opportunists" who were peddling "cynical and pernicious falsehoods" to gain political advantage while US soldiers died in Iraq. In response, Senator John Kerry asserted, "It is hard to name a government official with less credibility on Iraq [than Cheney]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney#Iraq_War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney#Iraq_War
  - Donald 7y ago
    It's a quote after the first Gulf War.

icebraining 7y ago

Which is exactly what was predicted: "That's a very volatile part of the world. And if you take down the central government in Iraq, you could easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off. Part of it the Syrians would like to have, the west. Part of eastern Iraq the Iranians would like to claim. Fought over for eight years. In the north, you've got the Kurds. And if the Kurds spin loose and join with Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey. It's a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq." -- Dick Cheney

kamyarg 7y ago
Correct me if I am wrong but isn't Cheney the one that basically pushed the war? When is this quote from? From the Wikipedia article: > Following the US invasion of Iraq, Cheney remained steadfast in his support of the war, stating that it would be an "enormous success story",[90] and made many visits to the country. He often criticized war critics, calling them "opportunists" who were peddling "cynical and pernicious falsehoods" to gain political advantage while US soldiers died in Iraq. In response, Senator John Kerry asserted, "It is hard to name a government official with less credibility on Iraq [than Cheney]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney#Iraq_War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney#Iraq_War
- Donald 7y ago
  It's a quote after the first Gulf War.