You implied that the actions werent illegal, by bringing up things that Boeing said, and implying that Boeing is biased, and also wrong. This is misleading, be

You implied that the actions werent illegal, by bringing up things that Boeing said, and implying that Boeing is biased, and also wrong. This is misleading, because the WTO has already ruled on this Airbus stuff. And the WTO thinks that the stuff that the EU did is illegal. Therefore it is illegal, and you shouldn't imply that it is not illegal. So yes, the stuff that the EU did is illegal. Full stop. It is illegal according to the WTO, and therefore it is irelevant to say that Boeing is Biased, because the authorities agree with Boeing and the authorities have ruled that it was illegal.