3 ms·
When RISC-V inevitably renames itself CISC-V, then what language would naturally fit together? And don't say cobol.
by DannyB2 7y ago
When RISC-V inevitably renames itself CISC-V, then what language would naturally fit together?
And don't say cobol.
- antoinealb 7y agoC++?
- kbenson 7y agoWhy nor CRISC-V? Or CaRISC-V? Or (eww) RaCISC-V? It's not like current "CISC" architectures haven't taken a lot of the good aspects of RISC already too...
- gpm 7y agoCython with a rust core?
- mindcrime 7y agoCeylon?[1] Crystal?[2] Church?[3] Coq?[4] [1]: https://ceylon-lang.org/ https://ceylon-lang.org/ [2]: https://crystal-lang.org/ https://crystal-lang.org/ [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_(programming_language) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_(programming_language) [4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coq https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coq
- Someone 7y agoCOMTRAN would be a way better choice than COBOL :-) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COMTRAN https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COMTRAN) Common Lisp would be a decent choice, too, with CISC:RISC = Common Lisp:Scheme
- madmulita 7y agoObviously: Clojure.
- astrobe_ 7y agoWell it would be "less risk", maybe even "riskless" so I guess you'd need a new language named "restless"?
- swsieber 7y agoV https://vlang.io/ https://vlang.io/ You could vlog about it.
- pnako 7y agoC Worse is better, forever.