3 ms·
There is a query cache. But I sorta doubt this benchmark took appropriate advantage of it. We don't know enough about how the author is running postgres to be s
by skywhopper 7y ago
There is a query cache. But I sorta doubt this benchmark took appropriate advantage of it. We don't know enough about how the author is running postgres to be sure. But the reported postgres numbers are pretty slow for machine-local SELECTs. Maybe Django's ORM is getting in the way?