3 ms·
If that was his point then title of the article shouldn't have been "Stuxnet is embarrassing, not amazing" rather "Here's how Stuxnet could have been even bette
by sskates 16y ago
If that was his point then title of the article shouldn't have been "Stuxnet is embarrassing, not amazing" rather "Here's how Stuxnet could have been even better"
- tptacek 16y agoI think "teenagers have written tfiles that are markedly more sophisticated than this virus" justifies the title, but this is a difference of opinion and a classic example of an unproductive HN argument. If you think his title sucks, fine.