3 ms·
A good system of government is resilient to bad leadership. Edit: do any of the down-voters care to explain why this is not the case? Stable is generally cons
by dsfyu404ed 7y ago
A good system of government is resilient to bad leadership.
Edit: do any of the down-voters care to explain why this is not the case? Stable is generally considered a prerequisite of good and history indicates that not going totally down the tubes when you have a bad leader is a perquisite of stable.
- namarie 7y agoSo there are no good systems of government then.
- dsfyu404ed 7y agoThe Roman empire lasted a pretty darn long time even with a lot of mediocre leadership. Various flavors of representative democracy seem to weather crappy leaders pretty well.
- icebraining 7y ago"Lasted" is a pretty weak standard. The Roman empire changed quite dramatically over time, probably more than Bulgaria or Albania.