> what arguments exactly do you feel could not legally be expressed in a modern first-world democracy, that actually should be expressed? Many people use “free

> what arguments exactly do you feel could not legally be expressed in a modern first-world democracy, that actually should be expressed? Many people use “free speech” to describe more than what is covered by the First Amendment in the USA. For instance, freedom from retaliation, by being fired from your job. According to that view, entities other than the government can engage in suppressing free speech.