> Yeah, and that would necessarily be a bad thing if your only priority was pwning people with facts and logic. I'm not interested in "pwning" anyone. But if s

> Yeah, and that would necessarily be a bad thing if your only priority was pwning people with facts and logic. I'm not interested in "pwning" anyone. But if someone says "this guy needs to be fired/resign" (which actually, in the rms case I kinda agree with), then they need to be able to articulate things in a manner that's not just "you're not from [some group] so you don't get it". It's just lazy and disrespectful to other people.