3 ms·
I worked for a Comcast subsidiary in 2010-2011 timeframe. The company owned the network end to end. They had about 250k subscribers at the time across 4 states
by windexh8er 7y ago
I worked for a Comcast subsidiary in 2010-2011 timeframe. The company owned the network end to end. They had about 250k subscribers at the time across 4 states and at the time was the first DOCIS 3.0 network in the US. They were collecting DNS log data back then. I've been told that hasn't stopped and has progressed. Don't trust your ISP to not be passively monitoring. This particular ISP had closets full of old Sandvines [0] hardware as well that I ran across one day. I asked what the hardware had been used for and the answer was simply: "network monitoring for law enforcement". At the time all of that old gear had been decomm'd. But as I've said in older posts the DC had a hands off, tamper taped mobile rack that was plugged into core routing installed by a 3 letter agency while I was employed. This was pre-Snowden and post 9/11, likely courtesy of all those fun programs we found out about that Clapper denied.
[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandvine https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandvine
- cabaalis 7y agoWe'll know how much this will affect those TLAs when the government suddenly gets involved for some altruistic reason to block DNS over HTTPS. "Don't let google take over the internet!" "Time to break up big tech!"
- windexh8er 7y agoI find it interesting that Google and CloudFlare are now the scapegoats. I mean, it's not like DoH isn't configurable and we don't have a choice.
- topranks 7y agoNot attacking Google - their approach here is fine. But Mozilla switching people is a worry for me. Sure people “have a choice” but in reality expecting the average Joe who doesn’t even know what DNS is to make an informed decision about it is unrealistic. Meanwhile Mozilla has started sending a list of every domain you visit to a US company subject to US law enforcement. Not ideal.
- everdrive 7y ago>Meanwhile Mozilla has started sending a list of every domain you visit to a US company subject to US law enforcement. Not ideal. Do you have an article which explains this?
- icebraining 7y agoMozilla only started to doing that for US users.
- teddyh 7y ago“started”
- everdrive 7y agoThanks for the explanation. I was curious about some more specifics: - How was the DNS logged? - Was every query logged, or only unique queries? - Was it combined with other data? - How long was it searchable for? - What were the DNS queries used for? Simply sold to 3rd parties? If so, who was buying?