If you read the article, it says the judge determined the exact opposite. That asians do not get a "fair shot". But the judge said that other concerns (histor

If you read the article, it says the judge determined the exact opposite. That asians do not get a "fair shot". But the judge said that other concerns (historical racism against other groups) trumps this current bit of racism such that, net net, it's ok for harvard to discriminate against asians. Opinions may differ on the correctness and morality of this decision.