3 ms·

It is when the courts say as a temporary measure its ok. You have to define temporary or else it just becomes de-facto permanent.

• balls187 7y ago
  > You have to define temporary or else it just becomes de-facto permanent. Perhaps, once it becomes settled law. However given Roe v Wade is still up for debate means that defacto permanence is not really a problem. The answer then is "When the supreme court decides that the argument presented is sufficient to warrant no longer allowing race-concious admissions is a factor."
  • vageli 7y ago
    > > You have to define temporary or else it just becomes de-facto permanent. > Perhaps, once it becomes settled law. However given Roe v Wade is still up for debate means that defacto permanence is not really a problem. > The answer then is "When the supreme court decides that the argument presented is sufficient to warrant no longer allowing race-concious admissions is a factor." Are new Roe v Wade like cases being heard by the court? There's a chilling effect to people bringing these cases to consider.
    • mlevental 7y ago
      https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/federal-judge-blocks-georgia-anti-abortion-law/yh1ttzbYdTcqiUT7OkyqkO/ https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/fede... I'm sure you're aware that like 10 other states have similar cases working their way through the court system
      • vageli 7y ago
        Ah, I was aware of a couple of suits in states. None yet heard by the Supreme Court, though (or slated for hearing). I wonder if the court would even hear arguments on what they consider to be settled case law.