>Who’s actually doing this? In a way that is actually documented? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Also I think it stretches the bounds of credu

>Who’s actually doing this? In a way that is actually documented? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Also I think it stretches the bounds of credulity to assert that an industry that bangs on and on about wanting to increase diversity is somehow also a perfect, disinterested and impartial judge.