They are talking about violence that you yourself had posited would be occurring in the context of an armed insurgency, which is a hypothetical that you posed.

They are talking about violence that you yourself had posited would be occurring in the context of an armed insurgency, which is a hypothetical that you posed. You're now twisting their response to your own example into something you're interpreting as a generalized wish for violence on people they disagree with, totally ignoring of the context of the conversation up to this point.