> remained fighting Without interruption? Then I stand corrected. I imagine the point would be to confound, give the time to extract the officer from immediat

> remained fighting Without interruption? Then I stand corrected. I imagine the point would be to confound, give the time to extract the officer from immediate danger, not to immobilize the attacker entirely with a rubber bullet. (And you’re right, I should not have phrased that as an assertion not being an expert in the field.)