> Either RMS was oblivious to the distress and distraction his comments would cause First, the conversation was internal, it was leaked to the public. Second,

> Either RMS was oblivious to the distress and distraction his comments would cause First, the conversation was internal, it was leaked to the public. Second, it's nothing new. He's been documenting his opinions for decades. Third, it was a relevant discussion because he was talking about the characterization of the events by the media. If you just have a bone to pick with RMS I'm not sure what there is left to discuss.