3 ms·
> But the ruling still appeared to offer a lifeline to net neutrality supporters: It overruled an effort by the FCC to block states from adopting open-internet
by jimktrains2 7y ago
> But the ruling still appeared to offer a lifeline to net neutrality supporters: It overruled an effort by the FCC to block states from adopting open-internet protections of their own, a move that could spur states such as California to act.
It'll be interesting to see how strong- and light-touch regulations in different states will play out over the next 5 - 10 years.
> "At bottom, the commission lacked the legal authority to categorically abolish all fifty States’ statutorily conferred authority to regulate intrastate communications," the court wrote.
> Judges Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins, both Obama appointees, were in the majority for the 2-to-1 ruling on that issue.
> The D.C. Circuit also said the FCC needed to spend additional time considering how its rules would affect public safety.
> In dissent, Judge Stephen Williams said the ruling would leave broadband "subject to state regulation in which the most intrusive will prevail."
- https://www.wsj.com/articles/fcc-rollback-of-net-neutrality-rules-is-partly-upheld-by-appeals-court-11569942446 https://www.wsj.com/articles/fcc-rollback-of-net-neutrality-...