4 ms·
> Agreed. But since so many middle managers are twits isn't it incumbent on the employee to learn a set of skills to deal with Johns? It's much easier to simpl
by johnmaguire2013 7y ago
> Agreed. But since so many middle managers are twits isn't it incumbent on the employee to learn a set of skills to deal with Johns?
It's much easier to simply find a better job without a John, or where you're shielded from John.
(My name breaks this analogy a bit.)
- KKKKkkkk1 7y agoI don't think it's easier, because: a) It's hard to identify a good manager ahead of time. b) People change; circumstances change. c) Your team and manager will change sooner than you expect, especially if they are a good team or manager.
- thothamon 7y agod) Constantly changing jobs every time some jerk floats into your circle doesn’t speak well of your character or look good on your resume.
- croh 7y agotrue if only you put real reasons on resumes.
- toomuchtodo 7y ago“The growth opportunities communicated to me when my tenure began never materialized.” Who stays anywhere more than 2-3 years now anyway?
- tombert 7y agoI largely agree with you. My current manager where I work is pretty cool. We get along pretty well, and I don't mind working for them. However, I think my manager's manager is...umm, well, let's just say "not very good at their job", fairly close to the "John" in this story. If my current manager quit or was fired or died, and I had to work for their manager, I probably would quit before I learned to effectively work with "John"; the job market is pretty good for engineers right now, why the hell not?