3 ms·
This is only a reply to: "ENA (one if not the most prestigeous uni in France)", and not to the ENA->ISF name change.
by duxut_staglatz 7y ago
This is only a reply to: "ENA (one if not the most prestigeous uni in France)", and not to the ENA->ISF name change.
- ganzuul 7y agoThat is not the point. The topic of the article is clear.
- JshWright 7y agoThere is no rule that says you can only reply to the primary point of a comment. Personally I found the clarification interesting, and learned something from it. Why do you think that detracts from the point about the potential motivation behind the rebranding? It's possible to learn more than one thing...
- ganzuul 7y ago"Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents."
- Wowfunhappy 7y agoThe full paragraph in the guidelines is: > Eschew flamebait. Don't introduce flamewar topics unless you have something genuinely new to say. Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents. In other words, if someone posts a story about the new iPhone, don't comment "Did you hear the rumor that Tim Cook likes killing puppies?"
- JshWright 7y agoThe more in-depth description of ENA is not unrelated, controversial, generic, or a tangent.