3 ms·
The issue has become heavily politicised and even worse, is now a fault line in identity politics. This is the death sentence for meaningful action. If only pub
by Gatsky 7y ago
The issue has become heavily politicised and even worse, is now a fault line in identity politics. This is the death sentence for meaningful action. If only publishing journal articles was enough.
I'm not sure that we are hoping for the right category of solution. All countries and people in the world uniting and making sacrifices... has this ever happened for anything ever? I am hoping there are examples, I just can't think of any. Maybe I'm overly pessimistic, but I just can't see the 'Unified Earth' solution happening, at least not because everyone just agrees to be that way.
Maybe the right analogy is something like the internet. If you were concerned about tyranny and oppression of free speech in the 1930s, it is doubtful you would ever conceive that the internet could be one 'solution' to that problem. It isn't a perfect or complete solution, and it actually makes the problem worse in some ways, but nevertheless, on that particular issue, the internet has changed the landscape completely. Maybe this category of solution is the best we can hope for. The trouble is that it is very hard to conceive of how it will look or what we should do.
- baq 7y agoone (i think the only, unfortunately) example of global cooperation due to a major environmental threat was the ozone hole and worldwide ban on CFCs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion so it's not unthinkable, but that was a piece of cake in comparison: replacements readily available, low economic impact, etc.
- bryanlarsen 7y agoLuckily there are solutions that don't require all countries uniting. https://issues.org/climate-clubs-to-overcome-free-riding/ https://issues.org/climate-clubs-to-overcome-free-riding/
- ZeroGravitas 7y agoPeople often talk about sacrifices, but we don't even make much progress on the stuff that's actively harmful and therefore a net benefit, like phasing out coal for cleaner energy, or building well insulated homes so I don't think that's the whole reason. In fact it seems like a talking point from one side.