Selam G wrote that Stallman considered that Minsky's victim was actually willing. That's not "planting evidence" in a legal sense because sure, that's not evid

Selam G wrote that Stallman considered that Minsky's victim was actually willing. That's not "planting evidence" in a legal sense because sure, that's not evidence at all. Mainly because it isn't true and it's easily verifiable. But in this context, by these people, it has been taken as actual evidence against Stallman. I guess that's the rationale behind the analogy.