2 ms·
Yeah, from someone who was there, that's almost it. I'd add hacker punk as another key influence. But seriously, you don't say that stuff in public these days.
by mirimir 7y ago
Yeah, from someone who was there, that's almost it. I'd add hacker punk as another key influence. But seriously, you don't say that stuff in public these days.
Edit: Even if you're joking, or just doing it to light people up. Which was, you know, quite the thing. Back in the day.
And damn, had to work at it, but I found a couple BOFH episodes that actually mention women.[0,1]
0) https://bofh.subversivedata.com/story/2009/4 https://bofh.subversivedata.com/story/2009/4
1) http://bofharchive.com/1998/bastard98-21.html http://bofharchive.com/1998/bastard98-21.html
- strenholme 7y agoYeah, I agree that you don’t say that stuff in public these days, and I have always felt that, with Romeo-and-Juliet exceptions, the age of consent should be respected. Keep in mind that, around the time RMS posted those more controversial blog entries (which I still feel are being quoted out of context [1]), the Wikipedia was allowing out and out pedophiles to post their disgusting and repulsive pro-pedophilia advocacy [2]. And, yes, I found that advocacy repulsive back then and find it repulsive today. [3] [1] https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/ https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/ No, I did not write this article, but I think it makes some legitimate points. [2] https://archive.is/iG9KX https://archive.is/iG9KX (Trigger warning for victims of child sexual abuse) [3] At https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pedophile_movement/Archive_13&diff=prev&oldid=4770710 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pedophile_mo... (Again, trigger warning) I expressed my opinion in 2004 that what the Wikipedia was allowing w.r.t. pro-pedophile opinions back then was repulsive, an opinion I still hold today.