4 ms·
Disclaimer: Startup in this space, highly biased, shameless pluggery. I think about this subject a lot. Three key innovations we'll see in the "next wave" of s
by tlack 7y ago
Disclaimer: Startup in this space, highly biased, shameless pluggery.
I think about this subject a lot. Three key innovations we'll see in the "next wave" of search engines that flood in to replace stinky incumbents (won't name any names here)
1. New user interfaces. My effort, Glorp, attempts to transition from the "link dump" style of results page to something akin to Instagram. Faster to scan, fewer surprises, more friendly for kids and old folks. AR/VR will have some unusual needs. Audio - Alexa and Siri. We need search (in different forms) everywhere. [1]
2. New business models. Privacy is in, advertising is out. That changes everything about the model. We'll see engines with tons of niche features, like link collections, recorded search journeys, curated subject matter experts, family accounts with parental controls, and, most importantly, monthly fees.
3. New search mechanisms: ML embeddings. Search by image similarity, video similarity, subject matter similarity. Machine learning models transform different types of content into convenient embedding vectors. BERT gives you a few hundred floats to represent the meaning of a sentence. ImageNet, the same, for images. Once you begin to build search tooling around the notion of document embeddings, rather than just "input text," we'll be able to help users discover things in a much broader set of scenarios. [2]
Hit me up, email in profile
[1] https://glorp.co/Search/search%20engine%20user%20interfaces https://glorp.co/Search/search%20engine%20user%20interfaces
[2] https://glorp.co/Search/search%20engine%20vector%20embeddings https://glorp.co/Search/search%20engine%20vector%20embedding...
- streetcat1 7y agoGoogle probably has tens of patents on each area that you mentioned. And since this is in their core offering they will probably use them.
- ryacko 7y agoI believe that those patents are only meant for mutually assured destruction. I doubt Google would really use them.
- ryacko 7y agoSounds like you have serious backing, that is a fairly professional outline. Reminds me of some Goldman Sachs reports I've read.
- tlack 7y agoWishful thinking :) Solo project with very tiny seed. I've just been pondering the issue for a long time.
- ryacko 7y agoThere's innovation as seen by the top down, where it is "add [new solution] to [old solution] to [madlib] the [industry]" and invention as seen by the bottom up, where it is "add [feature] to [old tool] to make better [tool]".