4 ms·
Because there are many less expensive ways to defend against drones than using drones. It has been considered and rejected. The cost is even more asymmetrical i
by jandrewrogers 7y ago
Because there are many less expensive ways to defend against drones than using drones. It has been considered and rejected. The cost is even more asymmetrical in favor of defense than implied by using defensive drones.
- noodlesUK 7y agoI think you’ll find a certain UK airport disagrees with you significantly. This sort of asymmetrical warfare isn’t about “attack” or “defence” in the strict sense, but it’s more about a less well-funded group inflicting significant losses on a more well-funded group.