5 ms·
Chatting at the moment, seems like a nice and useful tool. There are some problems (people not being able to speak by default before being followed by the chann
by senko 16y ago
Chatting at the moment, seems like a nice and useful tool. There are some problems (people not being able to speak by default before being followed by the channel creator), which I've already reported to the developer.
For me (been IRCing for 15yrs), this is different from both ad-hoc webchats and IRC. It's better integrated into Twitter experience than your typical webchat. If you're a Twitter user and would like chat-like capability, you don't need to register, invite your followers over, etc (technically, you do need to do all of that, but it uses Twitter auth & profiles, so it's like an extension of twitter).
On that point, maybe it'd be great to provide plugins/scripts for other clients (see Embedly's Parrotfish) to instantly create & invite someone to a room from inside your Twitter (the official web, or some other) client; ie. a shortcut for creating the room and copypasting the url.
EDIT: I don't think it'd ever be a replacement for IRC, but neither do I think it should. I like the "IRC for Twitter" niche (how about "IRC for Facebook?").
- alexk7 16y agoChat is already built in Facebook.
- senko 16y agoGroup chat? I haven't seen that feature (OTOH I don't use Facebook chat so I might've missed it).
- cherring 16y agoThat's true, how dare they build something that facebook has had a stab at! But seriously, people might not have the people they want to talk to about tech or something else on facebook, so if your twitter followers are your crowd for X subject this is a pretty cool way to have a chat with them.