Interestingly enough, dangerous technology has a negative bias towards morality, meaning that an actor less concerned with moral aspects of advancing such techn

Interestingly enough, dangerous technology has a negative bias towards morality, meaning that an actor less concerned with moral aspects of advancing such technology incurs less resistance in doing so. If US military succumbs to public pressure and stops developing autonomous weapons (purely hypothetical, never gonna happen), Russia or China will not, and we end up in a situation where the least moral actor has the most powerful and advanced drones. There's a similar situation in eugenics/genetics and other morally dubious research areas.