3 ms·
Unethical for whom? It's not like ethics is universal.
by mijamo 7y ago
Unethical for whom? It's not like ethics is universal.
- queercode 7y agoI'd say unethical for everyone. This isn't even just an "animal rights" debate. It's also a debate about the impact that eating meat has on the environment. There's way too many "eat less meat" articles to list, but here's one: https://time.com/5648082/un-climate-report-less-meat/ https://time.com/5648082/un-climate-report-less-meat/ Sure, it's a bit of a jump from "eat less meat" to "eat no meat", but the trend is there.
- odessacubbage 7y agohow about instead of eat less meat, eat less shitty meat and cook more? in all likelihood, you'll save money and feel better.
- moocow157 7y agoOf course it is. If you mean by this to endorse moral relativism, then there is no further ethical conversation that can be had on this whatsoever.