36 ms·
I absolutely would. One of the best things we can do for poor people - and for the economy as a whole - is getting them physical access to better jobs. If peo
by kgermino 7y ago
I absolutely would. One of the best things we can do for poor people - and for the economy as a whole - is getting them physical access to better jobs. If people are trapped in an economically dead area the few grand it would take to support them moving to a more vibrant area is a pittance, especially compared to the cost of bringing jobs and services to rural areas.
I'm absolutely opposed to forcing people to move, but if they want to I have no problem spending a bit to help them.
(For reference I tend libertarian-ish)
- hanniabu 7y agoIf you instead move a doctor to a rural area it's a much more cost effective solution because that one doctor could treat everyone in the area rather than needing to move everyone in that area out of the rural area. A new doctor in the rural area would also create jobs as they would need at least a receptionist.
- SamReidHughes 7y agoThat act of "creating a job" is just a money transfer from some people in the area to another. The only real thing to celebrate is the actual work being done.