3 ms·
In theory they get a free education, but in reality the huge majority of a student-athlete's focus is on sports (at least football and basketball). Just look a
by roland35 7y ago
In theory they get a free education, but in reality the huge majority of a student-athlete's focus is on sports (at least football and basketball). Just look at the majors for athletes on the teams - almost never anything too difficult.
There are also plenty of examples of "classes" that athletes have taken in the news, i.e. University of North Carolina, and more
- kevin_thibedeau 7y agoIf they aren't interested in academics they don't belong in college.
- altoidaltoid 7y agobut if college ball is the path to the pros... look at Basketball and Football vs. Hockey. Hockey has a well established Junior/Major Junior feeder system. NBA/NFL benefit from an unpaid sorting mechanism via the NCAA.
- kevin_thibedeau 7y agoIt isn't college's responsibility to serve as a farm league for professional sports. Particularly those with money to fund their own.
- apendleton 7y agoThis is backwards. The system is set up to make it impossible for players to both be successful students and successful athletes -- they're expected to spend most of their time on sport. That that's the case is absurd, but placing the onus on the students to rectify the situation bizarre; they have the least power of anyone involved. The onus should be on the schools. Universities' principal missions should be pedagogy and research. If college sports as they now exist require hampering students' ability to learn (or, I suppose, do research), having those sports teams and operating them the way they do is in conflict with what should be their mission, and they should stop having sports teams.
- kevin_thibedeau 7y agoThe NCAA is a cartel. The absurdity is that Congress won't do anything about it. Of course that would irreparably damage football and the extra four years professional wannabes need to bulk up on HGH and whatever steroids they can sneak past the test regime.