4 ms·

Sorry maybe a stupid question but would not be Mxnet better for what you do in TF?

• alfalfasprout 7y ago
  Agreed, MxNet is faster and considerably easier to use than TF.
  • solidasparagus 7y ago
    There's absolutely no evidence that MXNet is faster than TF. At the high end, all three (TF/PyTorch/MXNet) are similarly performant. The reality is that implementation matters more than framework when you are talking about performance.
    • StreamBright 7y ago
      My question was more about usability or interchangeability. Could TF get replaced by Mxnet in a typical deep learning project?
      • solidasparagus 7y ago
        In terms of features and functionality, they are very much interchangeable. A new project could be written in any of the three major frameworks and be equally good. The only standout feature I'm aware of is that TF has the best support for doing inference on devices, but that won't be true forever. In terms of actually migrating a codebase from one to the other, the APIs are different enough in small ways that it would be a large amount of effort.