> Imbalance is bad because participation in civil society, to include employment, should be representative of society as a whole. So when society changes the d

> Imbalance is bad because participation in civil society, to include employment, should be representative of society as a whole. So when society changes the demographics we have to fire and hire the right amount? Sorry you're the best candidate we've ever interviewed but we have hired too many black men and are above our diversity quota. > Besides, inclusive and diverse workforces have been repeatedly shown to be better for the bottom line because organizations are more able to serve a wider market when they are made up people more representative of the total market. Is it the diversity of color or diversity of thought that is what drives a better bottom line? I'm gonna go on a hunch it's the diversity of thought that you're taking credit for.