4 ms·
> But I'm not convinced that's a bad thing. It's hard to predict, but one could expect larger disparity than even exists today amongst schools (arguably the di
by kodablah 7y ago
> But I'm not convinced that's a bad thing.
It's hard to predict, but one could expect larger disparity than even exists today amongst schools (arguably the disparity today is based on coach and facility costs, and will grow when it includes players). That disparity is not only one school compared to another, it's also the programs within a school itself and the ability for NCAA and conference funds to be redistributed. So much legislation was focused on equality of services across sports programs and universities, this is clearly a step towards inequality (even if it is a good step).
- lostapathy 7y agoAt the same time - there are a lot of wealthy alumni from schools without a noteworthy program that would be more than happy to directly play some players to come put their alma matter on TV for a couple seasons.