> Stallman defended Minsky > People are angry at Stallman for what he actually said, not what you think they think he said. This isn't the lie we're talking a

> Stallman defended Minsky > People are angry at Stallman for what he actually said, not what you think they think he said. This isn't the lie we're talking about, whatever else people are angry about, many are angry about: "MIT Scientist Defends Marvin Minsky: Epstein Victim Likely ‘Presented Herself’ as ‘Entirely Willing’" This headline implies Stallman was defending Epstein, not Minsky, and suggest he said the victim was "willing". > and he had to ignore the legal definitions of both words He didn't ignore them, he criticised their usage and how they are perceived by the public; Are you going to comment on the full context and motivation behind Stallmans' comment?