7 ms·
Well, they were internally discussing a proposed Code of Conduct. I imagine mods are bound by an NDA, and management are choosing not to share.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Well, they were internally discussing a proposed Code of Conduct. I imagine mods are bound by an NDA, and management are choosing not to share.
- wendyshu 7y agoAh. Very frustrating to read complaints that omit key info. Would have been nice if they explained that they're under an NDA.
- SnarkAsh 7y agoI agree it should have been clarified, but the initial intended audience was meta users who would be familiar. Elected moderators need to accept the https://stackoverflow.com/legal/moderator-agreement https://stackoverflow.com/legal/moderator-agreement agreement before they're giving their privileges, and they have to agree not to disclose any information that they get obtain using their mod access, such as the private discussions between moderators and staff here. It might not be legally binding, but Stack Overflow could plausibly delete their account as punishment.