> You argue for sustainability as an axiomatic value (and I agree) - but sustainability is not an automatic consequence of something being natural Yes but that

> You argue for sustainability as an axiomatic value (and I agree) - but sustainability is not an automatic consequence of something being natural Yes but that simply means it is not a deductive argument [1]. This is very far from being fallacious. It would be quite disastrous to regard all deductive arguments as false at least in everyday life. "the weather report is for snow - wrap up well" [1] https://www.iep.utm.edu/ded-ind/ https://www.iep.utm.edu/ded-ind/