4 ms·

>Even with mass shootings a daily occurrence, the gun industry has lobbied its way out of any meaningful oversight. As another posted has stated: guns are high

>Even with mass shootings a daily occurrence, the gun industry has lobbied its way out of any meaningful oversight. As another posted has stated: guns are highly regulated. The conditions used to infer "mass shootings a daily occurrence" selects every event involving a firearm and at least 4 people regardless of their level of involvement. This also discounts defensive gun use numbers. Does anyone know how to respond to the cell radiation one? There is no established link, although theoretically the frequencies used could interact with biological molecules (mainly microwave frequencies and water) which makes it hard to refute.

swebs 7y ago
>The National Toxicology Program (NTP) concluded in two final reports released Nov. 1 that there is clear evidence that male rats exposed to high levels of radio frequency radiation (RFR), like that used in 2G and 3G cell phones, developed cancerous heart tumors. There was also some evidence of tumors in the brain and adrenal gland of exposed male rats. https://factor.niehs.nih.gov/2018/11/feature/1-feature-radiation/index.htm https://factor.niehs.nih.gov/2018/11/feature/1-feature-radia...
- CSSer 7y ago
  > The lowest exposure level used in the studies was equal to the maximum local tissue exposure currently allowed for cell phone use. This power level rarely occurs with typical usage patterns. The highest exposure level in the studies was four times higher than the maximum power level permitted for local tissues.