3 ms·
It's unclear from the article what his crime was, only that he escaped from a prison camp. It could be that his only crime was being Tibetan or Uighur or a memb
by sverige 7y ago
It's unclear from the article what his crime was, only that he escaped from a prison camp. It could be that his only crime was being Tibetan or Uighur or a member of Falun Gong or that he said something against the government. It's China, so the only 'victims' might be the prison guards on whose watch he escaped.
- wronghorse 7y agoThe second line of the article mentions that he was jailed for trafficking women and children.
- sweetheart 7y agoThe article immediately mentions he was originally imprisoned for human trafficking. It’s the first or second sentence.
- merlincorey 7y ago> It's unclear from the article what his crime was, only that he escaped from a prison camp. It is spelled out clearly in the article why: > The 63-year old, named Song Jiang by the police, had been jailed for trafficking women and children but escaped from a prison camp in 2002.
- azinman2 7y agoIt says so literally in the first paragraph: “The 63-year old, named Song Jiang by the police, had been jailed for trafficking women and children but escaped from a prison camp in 2002.“
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- sverige 7y agoDon't know how I missed that. Sorry everyone.