3 ms·
And how much longer before they use facial recognition to identify the fugitive then execute the arrest?
by TheBeardKing 7y ago
And how much longer before they use facial recognition to identify the fugitive then execute the arrest?
- wil421 7y agoExecute made me think of Judge Dredd. What the movies gets wron is it won’t be a person who is the Judge it will be an AI. Fugitive match found, sending drones to confirm, deploying Cop AI, running Judge routine, sentenced to death. I am the law.
- foxhop 7y agoWe call it, law-and-justice-as-a-service
- SiempreViernes 7y agoJustify(tm) Sadly, both justify.com and justify.it are squatted it appears.
- milankragujevic 7y agojustify.ai too.
- reportgunner 7y agojustif.ai
- dangerface 7y agoDunno why people are down voting you, china already does this. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2157883/drones-facial-recognition-and-social-credit-system-10-ways-china https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2157883/dron...
- CriticalCathed 7y agoHow much longer before governments, at society's request, use autonomous drones and facial recognition technology to execute enemies of the state and petty criminals remotely?
- svachalek 7y agoEnemies of the state in hostile countries, that's been standard policy for nearly as long as drones have existed. It's a new and improved form of assassination which is used for the same kind of things assassination has always been used for. Petty criminals are another story entirely. We could easily let human officers fire at will if we supported it as a society, but we don't, so automating that is not a natural step forward. On the other hand, simply using the recognition side of the equation is a more slippery slope. Wanted posters have been accepted for centuries, so this is in many ways just an improvement on what police already do. But just because something is accepted as a necessary evil doesn't mean that it is still acceptable at orders of magnitude greater efficiency.