>The other people in those organization do get to have a say too you know. True, and when squinting, the scenario is understandable: "High profile employee rep

>The other people in those organization do get to have a say too you know. True, and when squinting, the scenario is understandable: "High profile employee repeatedly receives negative press, so the organization doesn't want to be associated." They're free to employ and endorse, or end a relationship, with anyone at will (modulo labor laws). The worrying thing here is, despite decades of bad behavior, they didn't distance themselves until he expressed unpopular opinions picked up by social media. It's like the saying, "The ends don't justify the means." This smacks of letting social media voices have a say in staff choices. Even if most people agree with the outcome, it's the wrong process. Edits: removing tangents to focus on the points.