4 ms·
Can you please read the thread yourself and point out to specific instances you are referring to? Because there is a lot of false information in this thread, li
by computerex 7y ago
Can you please read the thread yourself and point out to specific instances you are referring to? Because there is a lot of false information in this thread, like so:
> Last week, on a private MIT mailing list, Richard Stallman argued that a sex trafficking survivor may have "willingly" presented herself, and thus Minksey hadn't really committed sexual assault. That being coerced by Epstein made it not rape.
Which is flat out wrong, and something that the article here explicitly demonstrates why it's false. Did you read the "Defense of Richard Stallman" article presented here in this thread?