5 ms·
I guess the new law reads "Can't release sulphur into atmosphere", so the shipping companies were thinking of ways around that. Why not say "Can't release … int
by wereHamster 7y ago
I guess the new law reads "Can't release sulphur into atmosphere", so the shipping companies were thinking of ways around that. Why not say "Can't release … into environment", which would cover air, sea, ground, space and everything else around us?
- markdown 7y agoThey definitely should dump it outside the environment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m5qxZm_JqM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m5qxZm_JqM
- latchkey 7y agohttps://www.snopes.com/fact-check/the-front-fell-off/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/the-front-fell-off/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirki_(tanker) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirki_(tanker)
- NeedMoreTea 7y agoThere was need for a Snopes fact check for that? Strewth.
- markdown 7y agoLOL does Snopes fact-check skits now?
- cannonedhamster 7y agoBecause people will take jokes as reality. See Storm Area 51.
- Karunamon 7y agoIn which case it should be labeled as a joke, not "false". And Snopes has a satire tag for this purpose.
- DonHopkins 7y agoThey should fact-check Rickroll bait, too!
- ptah 7y agothere should be a some kind of spirit of the law wording in addition i think.