4 ms·
No, if you have names of people and evidence as to who said what, fine. You can’t expect the police to investigate every overheard conversation, the “murder” fo
by andy_ppp 7y ago
No, if you have names of people and evidence as to who said what, fine. You can’t expect the police to investigate every overheard conversation, the “murder” for all you know is probably in Grand Theft Auto.
- jakelazaroff 7y ago> No, if you have names of people and evidence as to who said what, fine. The whistleblower went so far as to name the alleged perpetrators. Surely that warrants additional investigation.
- andy_ppp 7y agoWe were talking about a hypothetical murder, overheard in a super market not the case in question which obviously must be investigated.
- jakelazaroff 7y agoSure. So in our hypothetical scenario — as in the whistleblower complaint — let's assume that our secondhand informant is able to name the alleged perpetrators and details of the crime, conveying information given to them by six firsthand witnesses. What police officer wouldn't follow up on that?
- andy_ppp 7y agoI really think you might want to reread my previous comment because it clearly states the things you’ve said but disagrees that something overheard in supermarket is evidence worth investigating as context is all important. Thanks!