5 ms·
Moderators: please add [paywalled] or [$] to paywalled content so I can ignore instead of wasting time. Thanks.
by jwildeboer 7y ago
Moderators: please add [paywalled] or [$] to paywalled content so I can ignore instead of wasting time. Thanks.
- chrisseaton 7y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html > But please don't post complaints about paywalls. Those are off topic.
- droithomme 7y agoPlease post the whole rule. You neglected this bit: > It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds. Where's the workaround? I don't find workarounds for WSJ. WSJ is locked out. Please post the workaround, or kindly stop badgering people as it is not productive. If there is no workaround that allows us to view WSJ articles, then WSJ article are NOT allowed here, per the rules you yourself selectively cited. The rule about paywalls are that paywalled articles must come with a workaround, and that people should not post complaints about paywalls. His post did not complain about paywalls themselves nor does mine. He requests that paywalled articles be tagged as such, a much more relaxed rule than the official rules which are that paywalled articles without workarounds, such as WSJ articles (unless someone would like to post a legal workaround allowing us to view WSJ articles), are not allowed.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- trimbo 7y agoThe 'web' link hacker news supplies worked for me (in incognito)
- chrisseaton 7y agoIf you don’t know how to workaround WSJ paywalls then ask someone - the rules allow for that. They didn't ask - they just complained. Or pay up and subscribe to the WSJ!
- craftinator 7y ago"Moderators: please add [paywalled] or [$] to paywalled content" That is asking.
- chrisseaton 7y agoNo, ask them for the workaround we mean.
- salawat 7y agoClear your cookies. For wsj.com. There is no responsibility to maintain cookies for someone else's benefit.
- dang 7y agoIf there's a workaround, it's ok. Users usually post workarounds in the thread. They did in this one. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10178989 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10178989 https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comment&storyText=false&prefix&page=0&query=by:dang%20paywall https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...