4 ms·
It’s pretty much arbitrary what we as an industry have decided “text” means (and this has changed over the years), and what features it ought to support. It’s
by ken 7y ago
It’s pretty much arbitrary what we as an industry have decided “text” means (and this has changed over the years), and what features it ought to support. It’s largely “what our technology easily supports today”.
For example, most people expect antialiasing (i.e., subsampling across space) but we seem to have written off the idea of motion blur (i.e., subsampling across time), except in some games.
It’s be technically more accurate to draw a quickly-dragged mouse cursor with a (correctly computed) blur, but that’s not generally easy to render today. And motion blur of moving subpixel antialiased text sounds like a nightmare right now, but with the right abstractions it might not be.
- leni536 7y agoMotion blur is only "accurate" if you assume that the viewer's eyeballs remain still and don't follow the moving object. Having said that not blurring isn't accurate either on current LCDs when the viewer follows the object. This is what black frame insertion is meant to correct.
- SpaceManiac 7y agoAntialiasing (nominally) makes text easier to read. Motion blur makes everything it's applied to harder to see.